10 #EndBadGovernance Protesters Granted Bail By Court
Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court in Abuja granted bail to 10 protesters arrested during the #EndBadGovernance movement on charges of treason, among other alleged offenses. These protesters had been detained for their involvement in the protests, which were part of a larger movement demanding accountability, transparency, and improved governance in Nigeria.
The decision was delivered in court on Wednesday, where Justice Nwite granted bail in the sum of N10 million to each of the defendants, alongside one surety in like sum. This ruling was viewed as a significant development in the unfolding legal battles concerning civil disobedience and protest rights in Nigeria.
In delivering the judgment, Justice Nwite highlighted the principles enshrined in Nigeria’s criminal justice system, particularly regarding the rights of individuals accused of crimes. He emphasized that the system provides clear guidelines for both the prosecution and defense, ensuring that justice is administered fairly.
The judge referenced the argument of the defense counsel, Abubakar Marshall, who represented the 1st, 2nd, and 4th defendants. Marshall’s argument centered on a fundamental legal tenet, which states that anyone charged with a criminal offense must be presumed innocent until proven guilty. This principle, which is essential in the rule of law, served as a critical basis for the bail application.
Justice Nwite, in his ruling, underscored this notion of presumed innocence, stating: “I have carefully considered the submission of the counsel on both divides. I hereby grant the defendants bail notwithstanding the crime.” This declaration by the judge points to a balanced approach, ensuring that while the allegations of treason and other charges are serious, the legal process should not deny the accused their fundamental rights.
The bail terms, which amount to N10 million per defendant and one surety each, are significant. Such high bail sums often reflect the gravity of the charges and the court’s interest in ensuring the defendants’ availability for trial. However, it also signals a commitment to fairness, as the court recognized the right of the accused to secure their freedom pending trial.
The #EndBadGovernance protests, which gained momentum alongside the larger #EndSARS movement, reflect deep-seated frustrations among many Nigerians, particularly the youth, about governance and political accountability in the country. The detention of protesters for treason has sparked widespread debates about freedom of expression, the right to protest, and the role of the state in managing civil unrest.
This ruling by Justice Nwite is likely to have far-reaching implications, not only for the defendants but also for the broader conversation about civic rights in Nigeria. It underscores the delicate balance that must be maintained between maintaining public order and protecting individual rights in a democratic society.
Further details regarding the case, including the full charges and future court dates, are expected to emerge as the trial progresses. However, this ruling sets an important precedent, reaffirming the principle that even in the face of serious allegations, the rule of law must prevail.